I'm not a Pearce fan and he was in most scenes so it was a bit of a struggle. I understand the screenplay was deliberately made complicated which might explain why I couldn't follow it at times.
There have been a number of war journalist docs but its still worth watching this – if for nothing else its closeness to the action. The disturbing thing is the seemingly lack of control or discipline of those with guns. No wonder civilians get killed.
I had problems with young Smith in "After Earth" (2013)– his acting is awful in this as well. Even though the film goes on for two hours too long I have never seen Jackie Chan look so tired and disinterested.The only highlight is the Chinese locations.
The screenplay is interesting but it doesn't require a high level of performance. The exterior scenes aren't great but they are more than compensated for by the interior set designs & props which are enhanced by the lighting which is used to effect.
The documentary lists those who declined to be interviewed – they are mainly prime ministers and politicians – it is a pity that they were unwilling to provide their side of the story – as it stands file this under "Crime".
At 5'7"Cruise must be one of the smaller action heroes but although he must have to stand on a box at times he can still strut his stuff. The screenplay is straight forward so there is no challenge for him in the acting department.
It has a hard hitting message which loses some of its impact because of a drawn out screenplay – but it is worth watching the scenes depicting the working conditions of the plant and Meryl's performance.